DSS DemoINTERACTIVE PREVIEW
Synthetic environment

Production-shaped workflows, safe fixtures, and no operational endpoints.

3Products9Core workflows12Interactive states
INTERACTIVE PRODUCT DEMOS

Mission control for safe product demos

Move between governed transfer, tenant operations, and orchestration decisions in one controlled route. Every surface uses synthetic data and sanitized operating context.

Pick & Drop: intake, policy, evidence, replayMSPStudio: tenant ops, SLA, onboarding, ticketsConsensus: quorum, execution gates, audit trail
3Products
9Core workflows
12Governance gates
Safe showcase guardrails

Identifiers, routes, and telemetry are representative only. The demos deliberately avoid customer data, operational endpoints, and reusable control-plane logic.

Active scenarioOperations day

DSS-AI-Consensus — Orchestration Demo

Operator-gated orchestration with quorum decisions, execution packets, and audit continuity. No action advances without consensus.

Simulate a controlled orchestration run: stage change packets, watch five specialized roles weigh in with confidence scores, and see how blocking dissent keeps execution closed until the evidence is complete. The demo focuses on explainable operating posture, gate decisions, and audit continuity without exposing internal runtime topology or execution code.

SELECTED ORCHESTRATION RUN
Run
ORCH-0142
Lane
EU production change lane
Packet
3 continuity notes attached
Control mode
operator-gated
Status
Awaiting final quorum
Open proposals: 3Gate families: 4Audit continuity: signed continuity log intact
Decision queue

Pending, approved, and blocked proposals stay visible in one orchestration rail so operators can explain why execution is moving or paused.

1 pending1 approved1 blocked
Operational context
Open proposals: 3Gate families: 4Audit continuity: signed continuity log intact

Mission board

Plan, code, test, review, and merge posture stay visible while execution remains gated.

Role status rail

Each role stays visible as the packet moves toward quorum and release gating.

Architect
mission decomposition
reasoned scope packActive
Developer
diff shaping
branch-safe editsActive
Tester
targeted checks
waiting on review handoffIdle
Reviewer
gate critique
policy variance sweepHeld
Builder
release bundle
awaiting full gatesIdle

Provider routing

Synthetic role-to-model map for the orchestration demo.

RoleModelp50 / p99StateRecent calls
Architectmodel-Ap50 320ms / p99 1.2ssteady
Developermodel-Bp50 410ms / p99 1.6ssteady
Testermodel-Cp50 280ms / p99 980mscooldown
Reviewermodel-Ap50 360ms / p99 1.4ssteady
Buildermodel-Dp50 220ms / p99 760mswarming

Provider failover trail

Recent routing decisions across primary, fallback, and cooldown providers.

  • 14:32:09Performance monitorprimaryprimary healthy, no failover needed
  • 14:31:47Security reviewerfallbackprimary timed out, fell back cleanly
  • 14:28:12Cost analystcooldownquota exceeded, cooling down 5 min

Control event stream

Sanitized orchestration events show decision posture without exposing repo paths or runnable commands.

14:22:08sysOperator opened the pending change set for facilitator review.
14:22:14planPlanner packet advanced to code review with synthetic evidence attached.
14:23:41gateSecurity dissent remains attached until rollback evidence is complete.
14:24:09voteQuorum weighting refreshed after the latest confidence update.
14:24:44reviewReviewer held the packet until test and rollback notes were restated for the operator.
14:25:03gateExecution gate stays closed until all mandatory checks are satisfied.

Quorum policy

Active gating rules and read-only variants — switching variants is a governance action, not a runtime toggle.

Active rules
Approvals required3-of-5Active
No high-confidence rejectionenforcedActive
Risk envelope assessedenforcedActive
Rollback note attachedmanualActive
Read-only variants
Relaxed2-of-5Available
Strict4-of-5 + unanimous riskAvailable
Hotfix bypassbypass deniedDisabled

All missions, events, and release signals shown here are synthetic demo fixtures with no live repositories, secrets, or executable commands.

Orchestration control room

Consensus should read like an explainable run surface: proposal backlog, quorum pressure, execution readiness, and operator-safe event context.

Decision backlog3 proposals visible1 still gathering votes
Execution gates2/4 checks satisfiedExecution posture can advance when quorum is met.
Observed timelineDEC-048Operator review remains open
01
Open a proposal ready for execution

Jump into the approved decision path and show quorum, gate checks, and the post-execution record in one continuous view.

02
Inspect a decision still gathering votes

Use the hotfix scenario to show how confidence, missing inputs, and quorum status keep the run visible before execution is allowed.

03
Trace a blocked decision

Show how one high-confidence rejection keeps the gate closed while preserving the full reasoning and risk context for operators.

3
Total decisions
69%
Avg. confidence
1/3
Approval rate
Decision queueDeploy hotfix to production payment gateway
DEC-0482/3 approvals
Execution gates2/4 checks satisfied
89% Weighted confidenceExecution posture can advance when quorum is met.
Next operator moveCollect the missing role inputs before the packet can move from review into execution gating.
2 approve0 reject · 3 pending

Quorum

Votes cast: 2/5Required: 3 approvals
2 approve0 reject0 abstain3 pending
Weighted confidence:88%

Risk Assessment

Risk score: 89%Overall: Risk level — high
Production downtimehigh
Blue-green deploy with instant rollback on health-check failure.
Data integrityhigh
Hotfix is read-only path — no schema or write changes.
Rollback complexitymedium
Previous artifact tagged and deployable in <2 min.

Change Impact

Deploy timeCurrent: —Proposed: ~12 min
Rollback windowCurrent: —Proposed: 5 min
Affected servicesCurrent: —Proposed: 3
Downtime riskCurrent: —Proposed: Medium

Agent Votes — Deploy hotfix to production payment gateway

1
Sentinel-1
Cost Analyst
approve
85%

“Hotfix prevents revenue loss from failed transactions.”

2
Sentinel-2
Security Reviewer
approve
91%

“Code diff reviewed. No new attack vectors introduced.”

3
Sentinel-3
Performance Monitor
pendingDelegate to:

“Awaiting load test results…”

4
Sentinel-4
Compliance Officer
pendingDelegate to:

“Awaiting change management ticket approval…”

5
Sentinel-5
Risk Assessor
pendingDelegate to:

“Evaluating rollback plan completeness…”

Decision audit log

14:02Decision proposed
14:08Quorum reached
14:09Gate checks passed
14:11Execution confirmed
Phase handoff trail

Phase handoff trail

How the decision moved through plan, develop, test, review, and build phases.

  1. Planpassed14:08
  2. Developpassed14:21
  3. Testactive14:34
  4. Reviewpending—
  5. Buildpending—

Decision Flow

✓
Proposed
✓
Voting
3
Quorum Check
4
Execution
NEXT IN THE DEMO ROUTE

Continue exploring the platform. Each demo lands you in a governed product surface.

01 · Pick & Drop: intake, policy, evidence, replayPick & Drop — Governed transfer

Trace policy-checked file transfers from queue through signed audit receipts.

Open demo02 · MSPStudio: tenant ops, SLA, onboarding, ticketsMSPStudio — Tenant operations

Switch tenants, drive onboarding, run service desk and scheduled workflows.

Open demo
Turn the demo into a real rollout

Align products and deployment in the evaluation route, then move operators into the governed portal chain.

Get StartedPortal login
DSS-AI-Consensus Demo — See Quorum Voting and Execution Gates | DSS